Meta ads

Meta ads management for Indian D2C brands

We run Instagram and Facebook campaigns on creator content, from creator handles, with usage rights cleared before anything goes live. Managed service for brands spending from one lakh a month, not another dashboard to learn.

  • Backed byGoogle for Startups
  • Payments byCashfree
  • Also oniOS and Android

Platform capabilities

Everything your team needs to discover creators, run campaigns, and measure outcomes, without tool sprawl.

01

Creator led creative

A steady supply of fresh assets, so the account does not stall when the current ad fatigues.

02

Ads from creator handles

Partnership ads that carry the creator name and social proof instead of your brand page.

03

Usage rights on record

Term, territory, and platforms agreed at brief time, so paid usage is licensed and not assumed.

04

Regional and multilingual

Creators who reach tier 2 and tier 3 audiences in the language those buyers actually follow.

05

Account setup done properly

Structure, pixel, Conversions API, and tracking fixed before we spend anything of yours.

06

One report, organic and paid

What the post earned on its own next to what the same asset returned with spend behind it.

How teams use it

Concrete workflows and proof points for this page, not generic platform copy.

01

You keep the ad account

We work as a partner inside your Meta Business Manager and media spend stays on your card, so the account, pixel, audiences, and history remain yours permanently.

02

Meta only, and we say so

We run Instagram and Facebook because that is where creator content works hardest. We do not take retainers for Google, Amazon, or Flipkart.

Bidding is automated, creative is not

Meta now decides most of the bidding and much of the placement on its own, so the lever a brand still controls is what the ad actually says and who appears in it. On Indian D2C accounts the usual failure is not a mis-set budget, it is a winning asset that fatigues and nothing tested behind it, which shows up as rising cost per result on a campaign nobody changed.

That makes creative supply the real constraint. A programme is healthy when new, testable assets arrive faster than the current ones wear out, so the numbers worth watching are cost per usable asset and the time between brief and asset going live, not the number of campaigns in the account.

  • The auction is largely automated already
  • Creative fatigue is the common stall
  • Judge the pipeline, not the campaign count

Ads that run from a creator handle

A partnership ad runs under the creator profile rather than the brand page, with brand budget behind it. The audience sees an account they already follow, alongside the follower count and comment history that a brand page cannot borrow, and the same asset usually behaves differently in the auction as a result.

It only works if it is set up before production. The creator has to authorise the placement on their own account, and the permission cannot be added retroactively once a campaign has been published, so whether a deliverable can ever become an ad is decided at brief time and not at launch.

  • The ad carries the creator identity
  • Authorisation happens on the creator account
  • Decide it at brief time, never after

Licensing paid usage before you spend

Content a creator made for their own feed is not automatically content a brand may advertise with. Paid usage needs its own agreement covering how long it may run, which territories and platforms it covers, and whether it may run from the creator handle, and all of that belongs in the brief rather than in a message thread after delivery.

We record those terms against the asset and track when they lapse, so nothing keeps spending past the licence it was bought under. Disclosure rules for paid partnerships apply in every market the ad serves, and building them into the brief costs nothing while retrofitting them to a live campaign is expensive.

  • Organic permission is not paid permission
  • Fix term, territory, and platforms upfront
  • Track licence expiry against the asset

What it costs and how we start

Management starts from forty five thousand rupees a month, and we ask for a minimum ad spend of one lakh a month. That floor is not a commercial preference. Below it Meta rarely gathers enough conversion data to leave the learning phase reliably, so a smaller budget mostly buys noise, and a single creator campaign is usually the better first step.

The full rate card, including how the fee moves as spend grows, comes on the call once we know your category and your margins. To begin we need partner access to your Meta Business Manager, your product margins, and half an hour a week with whoever owns marketing internally. Media spend stays on your own card throughout.

  • Management from forty five thousand a month
  • Minimum ad spend of one lakh a month
  • Media spend always stays on your card

Frequently asked questions

Who owns the ad account?

You do, permanently. Limurse works as a partner inside your Meta Business Manager and media spend stays on your own card, so the account, pixel, audiences, and history stay with you if we stop working together.

What does Meta ads management cost?

Management starts from forty five thousand rupees a month, with a minimum ad spend of one lakh a month. The full rate card is shared on the call, once the category and margins are known.

Why is there a minimum ad spend?

Below roughly one lakh a month, Meta rarely collects enough conversion data to leave the learning phase reliably. A single creator campaign is usually a better first step than a managed retainer at that budget.

Do you run Google, Amazon, or Flipkart ads?

No. Limurse runs Instagram and Facebook, where creator content works hardest, and we would rather say so than take a retainer for a platform we are not the right team to run.

Build better brand-creator partnerships

Whether you are building a campaign or your creator business, keep discovery, communication, deliverables, and results clear from the start.