YouTube · No sign-up

YouTube sponsorship rate calculator

Know your rate.
Name it well.

Price integrations and dedicated videos against real creator rate cards. YouTube rates track views more closely than subscriber count, so treat the bands as a starting point and weight your recent median views.

Calculate my rate Private by design · Nothing is stored

Sample rate brief

Illustrative estimate

Sponsored post · Recommended anchor

$250

Flexible floor

$175

Premium ceiling

$350

Real rate cards
Live modifiers
No data saved

A range you can defend

The pricing principle

YouTube sponsorships are priced against average views, not subscriber count, because a video keeps accumulating views long after it goes live. A 60 to 90 second integration is the standard unit. A dedicated video prices substantially higher, since the brand takes the title, thumbnail, and whole runtime.

In India, a creator with under 10K subscribers charges a median of ₹2,000 for a sponsored video; with 10K to 50K subscribers, ₹5,000 for a sponsored video; with 50K to 250K subscribers, ₹10,000 for a sponsored video. These are medians of rate cards creators publish on Limurse, in rupees; the tables below show the typical range for every band. See the full tables

Build a rate you can defend

Set your audience signal, add the rights a brand wants, then use the live brief as your negotiation anchor.

Build your benchmark

Tell us your signal.

Comparing you with the 10K to 50K band.

%
0%Strong signal12%+
What else is the brand buying?

Live rate brief

Reel or video

Peer benchmark

$200

Your confident opening number. It sits at the centre of a defensible range, not at the edge of what a brand might accept.

Flexible floor

$75

Premium ceiling

$375

Your recommended anchor
Audience band10K to 50K
Engagement3.0%
Rights upliftNot included
Evidence149 rate cards

Switch deliverable

Use the anchor in your proposal, keep the range for negotiation. Scope, turnaround and brand fit can move the final fee. Agree usage rights in writing before you quote.

Turn this estimate into a campaign brief

Keep the calculator free and anonymous. When you are ready, carry the planning forward with goals, deliverables, usage rights, and a creator shortlist in one structured brief.

YouTube rate benchmarks by audience band

Published percentiles from creator rate cards on Limurse. The median is the going rate; the spread is where negotiations land.

US dollars (USD)

YouTube rate benchmarks by audience band, in US dollars
SubscribersReel or videoFeed post
Under 10K$70$25 to $150Median of 476 rate cards$50$15 to $100Median of 474 rate cards
10K to 50K$150$60 to $300Median of 149 rate cards$100$50 to $173Median of 146 rate cards
50K to 250K$300$150 to $500Median of 91 rate cards$200$100 to $400Median of 93 rate cards
250K to 1M$900$450 to $2,100Median of 23 rate cards$500$225 to $950Median of 22 rate cards
1M and up$1,500$700 to $4,650Median of 11 rate cards$500$300 to $1,800Median of 9 rate cards

Bold figures are the median rate. The line beneath is the 25th to 75th percentile spread, which is the range most negotiations land in. Cells marked as estimated did not have enough published rate cards to report safely, so they show the calculator formula instead. Aggregated from 2240 published rate cards; groups below the minimum sample are suppressed so no individual rate is identifiable.

Indian rupees (INR)

YouTube rate benchmarks by audience band, in Indian rupees
SubscribersReel or videoFeed post
Under 10K₹2,000₹1,000 to ₹3,500Median of 1585 rate cards₹1,000₹500 to ₹2,000Median of 1585 rate cards
10K to 50K₹5,000₹2,000 to ₹10,000Median of 867 rate cards₹2,000₹1,000 to ₹5,000Median of 854 rate cards
50K to 250K₹10,000₹3,125 to ₹20,000Median of 386 rate cards₹5,000₹2,000 to ₹10,000Median of 375 rate cards
250K to 1M₹20,000₹8,000 to ₹32,500Median of 51 rate cards₹8,000₹4,625 to ₹13,750Median of 50 rate cards
1M and up₹35,000₹15,000 to ₹68,750Median of 14 rate cards₹15,000₹6,250 to ₹47,500Median of 14 rate cards

Bold figures are the median rate. The line beneath is the 25th to 75th percentile spread, which is the range most negotiations land in. Cells marked as estimated did not have enough published rate cards to report safely, so they show the calculator formula instead. Aggregated from 8655 published rate cards; groups below the minimum sample are suppressed so no individual rate is identifiable.

YouTube is the platform where subscriber count misleads most. A video keeps earning views for months, so a brand is buying a back catalogue position as well as a launch. Price against your recent median views rather than your subscriber number, and price a dedicated video well above an integration, since it gives up the title, the thumbnail, and the full runtime.

How these numbers are produced

The method in full, so you can judge the figures rather than take them on trust.

Creators on Limurse publish a rate card as part of their profile. Those figures are grouped by deliverable and by audience band, and reported as the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile of each group. Any group with fewer contributors than the minimum sample is dropped entirely rather than reported with a caveat, so no individual creator's rate can be worked back out of a published number.

Where a band has too few rate cards to publish, the calculator falls back to a transparent formula: a cost per thousand followers for a feed post, weighted by deliverable, scaled by engagement rate against a two percent baseline. Those cells are labelled as estimates throughout, and they are never mixed into the published percentiles.

Usage rights and category exclusivity are applied as uplifts on top of the base deliverable rather than as separate charges, because both extend how much value a brand takes from the same piece of work. Figures are rounded to negotiable numbers on purpose. A rate card that reads to the smallest currency unit implies a precision this data does not have.

These are starting points for a negotiation, not quotes, and not a guarantee of what any brand will pay. Brands comparing those asking rates with measured CPM, CPE and ROAS can use the Creator Commerce Index.

Republishing these figures

The benchmark tables are open data. Quote them, chart them, or build on them in your own analysis.

These percentiles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. You are free to reproduce the tables, quote individual figures, and adapt them for your own work, including commercially, provided you credit Limurse and link back to the page you took them from.

Attribution line

Source: Limurse creator rate benchmarks, https://limurse.ai/youtube-rate-calculator

The tables are recalculated as creators update their rate cards, so cite this page rather than a saved copy. If your figures need to stay reproducible, name the date you read them.

Frequently asked questions

How much should a YouTuber charge for a sponsorship?

YouTube rates track average views far more closely than subscriber count, because a back catalogue keeps earning. Price a 60 to 90 second integration against your recent median views, and price a dedicated video substantially higher, since it carries the whole runtime and the title and thumbnail.

What is the difference between an integration and a dedicated video?

An integration is a segment inside a video about something else. A dedicated video is built entirely around the brand, which means the title, thumbnail, and full runtime are given over to it. Dedicated videos price well above integrations for the same channel.

Should YouTube rates be based on subscribers or views?

Views. Subscriber count measures history, and view count measures what a brand actually receives. A channel with modest subscribers and strong recent views is worth more to an advertiser than the reverse.

Publish your rate card on Limurse

Creators who list a rate card get matched to briefs with a budget that fits, and their figures help keep these benchmarks current.